Thursday 3 December 2015

State Sovereignty

New Whig
Interesting constitutional questions about where sovereignty rightly rests in systems like ours. The Canadian Provinces were not included in their federal government's change of succession. New Whig questioned the process when the Australian States passed their authority in the matter to the Commonwealth instead of each changing their own succession laws as the separate sovereign states they are. Now the fudge that happened in Canada is being tested. Her Majesty is separately Queen of each Australian State. It has been suggested that an individual Australian State could become a Republic, but stay within the Commonwealth of Australia that still retains the Crown. (A reverse analogy is Hawaii that could restore its State Monarchy and remain within the Republic of the United States.) Perhaps George and Charlotte will grow up sharing their royal apprenticeship and perhaps be joint monarchs when the time comes, like William and Mary, except siblings instead of spouses.
BRITAIN’S efforts to harmonise changes to royal succession rules across the 16 nations where the Queen is head of state came under threat from a court case…
express.co.uk|By Richard Palmer, Royal Correspondent

No comments:

Post a Comment